Head to head
Markdown vs Novada
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Markdown
Cio.github.mrfentmen/markdown-mcpNo reviews yet
Convert markdown to HTML and extract headings locally. No network and no key.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Search, extract, crawl, map, research, scrape 16 platforms, browser automation, proxy — one API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Novada (96/100 against 65). Novada is hosted and callable through the gateway; Markdown runs on your own machine. Novada has noticeably more public adoption.
| Markdown | Novada | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A96/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 176 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |