Head to head
Ipwhois vs Trips
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Ipwhois
Cio.github.mrfentmen/ipwhois-mcpNo reviews yet
IP address lookup with location and network details. No key required.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Hand someone a complete trip as a private, editable map link. No account, no API key, no card.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trips (85/100 against 65). Trips is hosted and callable through the gateway; Ipwhois runs on your own machine. Trips has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ipwhois | Trips | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 277 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 1 | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |