Head to head
Disify vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Disify
Cio.github.mrfentmen/disify-mcpNo reviews yet
Email validation from Disify. No key required.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Email infrastructure for AI agents: send, read replies as threads, campaigns, per-key limits.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (84/100 against 65). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Disify runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Disify | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 452 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 1 | 55 |
| Write actions | — | 16 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-22 |
| Category |