Head to head
Commoncrawl vs ReplyNodes
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Use this MCP server to Common Crawl index discovery for historical web captures. Tools include...
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web MCP: scrape/crawl sites, web search, brand assets, app stores, YouTube, Reddit, Hacker News.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 89 out of 100). ReplyNodes is hosted and callable through the gateway; Commoncrawl runs on your own machine. ReplyNodes has noticeably more public adoption.
| Commoncrawl | ReplyNodes | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | 51 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-08 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |