Head to head
Jacobian vs Nanograms to grams, number discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Jacobian (92/100 against 81). Nanograms to grams, number discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; Jacobian runs on your own machine. Jacobian has noticeably more public adoption.
| Jacobian | Nanograms to grams, number discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 192 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 352 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 30 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |