Head to head
TinyFish Guided Research vs Youtube Data
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
YouTube data for AI agents: channels, videos, transcripts, comments, search. Video research.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Youtube Data (98/100 against 83). Youtube Data is hosted and callable through the gateway; TinyFish Guided Research runs on your own machine.
| TinyFish Guided Research | Youtube Data | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 105 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |