Head to head
Mizan vs Agent Wormhole
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Check an x402 endpoint before your agent pays it: avoid / caution / ok, proven on-chain.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Check tokens, pages and x402 payments before your agent trusts them. Offline verdicts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent Wormhole (83/100 against 65). Mizan is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent Wormhole runs on your own machine. Agent Wormhole has noticeably more public adoption.
| Mizan | Agent Wormhole | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 776 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |