Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Pain001

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsio.github.MikeyPetrillo/agent402
A
No reviews yet

Agentic Finance: 500+ agent tools, multi-chain USDC over x402 or MPP, free via PoW or card credits

Full listing
Pain001io.github.sebastienrousseau/pain001-mcp
A
No reviews yet

MCP server for ISO 20022 pain.001/pain.008 payment-file generation and validation.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 92 out of 100). Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools is hosted and callable through the gateway; Pain001 runs on your own machine. Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsPain001
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100A92/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars81
Downloads / week468–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools15—
Write actions3—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0NOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryFinanceFinance

Other comparisons

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs BlockrunAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs ITIN FinanceAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Pyfile LLM & Data APIAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs RONIN Web ResearchAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs OrlaAll Finance servers