Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs RunOnProof — Payment Decision and Agent ID

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsio.github.MikeyPetrillo/agent402
A
No reviews yet

Agentic Finance: 500+ agent tools, multi-chain USDC over x402 or MPP, free via PoW or card credits

Full listing
RunOnProof — Payment Decision and Agent IDio.github.runonproof/cdo
C
No reviews yet

Free agent identity and signed US supplier-payment decisions. Inspect first; verify portable proof.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools (86/100 against 57). Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsRunOnProof — Payment Decision and Agent ID
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100C57/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars8–
Downloads / week499–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools1516
Write actions22
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0—
Last release2026-09-19—
CategoryFinanceFinance

Other comparisons

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs BlockrunAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs ITIN FinanceAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Pyfile LLM & Data APIAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs RONIN Web ResearchAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs OrlaAll Finance servers