Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Analyst Ratings

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsio.github.MikeyPetrillo/agent402
A
No reviews yet

Agentic Finance: 500+ agent tools, multi-chain USDC over x402 or MPP, free via PoW or card credits

Full listing
Analyst Ratingsio.github.pipeworx-io/analyst-ratings
B
No reviews yet

Analyst Ratings — today's US stock analyst upgrades, downgrades, coverage initiations and…

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools (86/100 against 77). Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsAnalyst Ratings
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100B77/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars80
Downloads / week468–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools1538
Write actions35
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryFinanceFinance

Other comparisons

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs BankMCP™Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs blockrun-mcpAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Hive Intelligence MCPAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Trading SignalsAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs worldbank-mcp-serverAll Finance servers