Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Wafeq

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsio.github.MikeyPetrillo/agent402
A
No reviews yet

Agentic Finance: 500+ agent tools, multi-chain USDC over x402 or MPP, free via PoW or card credits

Full listing
Wafeqio.github.ohneben/wafeq-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Wafeq accounting API: all 251 endpoints as safety-categorized MCP tools, over stdio or HTTP.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools (86/100 against 73). Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools is hosted and callable through the gateway; Wafeq runs on your own machine. Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsWafeq
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100B73/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars80
Downloads / week499–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools15—
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-15
CategoryFinanceFinance

Other comparisons

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs BlockrunAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs ITIN FinanceAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Pyfile LLM & Data APIAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs OrlaAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs X402 Data GatewayAll Finance servers