Head to head
Memory Vault vs Tinycontext
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid search. Postgres + pgvector. Self-hosted, MIT.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tinycontext (82/100 against 70).
| Memory Vault | Tinycontext | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 63 | 8 |
| Downloads / week | – | 68 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-05 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |