Mmcp.market

Head to head

Playwright vs Ziplark

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Playwrightio.github.microsoft/playwright-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Playwright Tools for MCP

Full listing
Ziplarkio.github.zhitongblog/ziplark
B
No reviews yet

Archive server: extract & create ZIP, 7z, tar, gz/xz/zst; read RAR/RAR5 & ISO. AES-256, safe.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Playwright (94/100 against 83). Playwright has noticeably more public adoption.

 PlaywrightZiplark
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA94/100B83/100
AdoptionWidely usedNew
GitHub stars37k1
Downloads / week6.0M–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Playwright vs Vibe Test — Browser Testing AgentPlaywright vs ClickcastPlaywright vs PlayrunnerPlaywright vs Weavatrix QualityPlaywright vs NetwrightAll Scraping and browsing servers