Head to head
Mu vs Text2Event
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
News, web search, mail, markets, weather, places, files, calendar, contacts. 67 tools, one endpoint.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Extracts calendar events from natural-language text, with .ics and calendar links.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Mu (84/100 against 57). Mu has noticeably more public adoption.
| Mu | Text2Event | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 434 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 156 | — |
| Write actions | 27 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | — |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |