Head to head
Crustdata vs Semantic Scholar MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real-time B2B data for agents: search and enrich 1B+ people and 200M+ company profiles.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for the Semantic Scholar API: search 200M+ papers, citations, authors, recommendations.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Semantic Scholar MCP Server (83/100 against 67). Crustdata is hosted and callable through the gateway; Semantic Scholar MCP Server runs on your own machine. Semantic Scholar MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Crustdata | Semantic Scholar MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 21 |
| Downloads / week | – | 310 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 14 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |