Head to head
Ghostfolio MCP vs Osboon
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only AI access to Osboon business card analytics, viewers, links, connections and contacts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Osboon (98/100 against 83). Osboon is hosted and callable through the gateway; Ghostfolio MCP runs on your own machine. Ghostfolio MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ghostfolio MCP | Osboon | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 19 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 372 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 38 | — |
| Write actions | 10 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |