Head to head
FEC Campaign Finance vs Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
FEC Campaign Finance
Corg.memoryapi/fecNo reviews yet
FEC campaign finance data: candidate fundraising, donors, and spending
Full listingNo reviews yet
Agentic Finance: 500+ agent tools, multi-chain USDC over x402 or MPP, free via PoW or card credits
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools (86/100 against 67). Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools has noticeably more public adoption.
| FEC Campaign Finance | Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 8 |
| Downloads / week | – | 499 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |