Head to head
csvql vs Gnosis MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Query CSV files with SQL via MCP. Fast, local, zero-config, read-only, sandboxable with --root.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Zero-config MCP server for searchable documentation. SQLite or PostgreSQL.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours csvql (88/100 against 77).
| csvql | Gnosis MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 27 | 29 |
| Downloads / week | – | 189 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |