Head to head
MCPFax Agent Continuity vs CCRider
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Resume the work, not the conversation. A checkpoint by one model is resumable by another.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Full-text search, browse, and resume across your coding agent sessions (Claude Code, Codex, Amp)
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CCRider (88/100 against 57). MCPFax Agent Continuity is hosted and callable through the gateway; CCRider runs on your own machine. CCRider has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCPFax Agent Continuity | CCRider | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 130 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 33 | — |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |