Head to head
MCPLookup vs Trust Tools
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Look up independent trust ratings and security, maintenance, and adoption evidence for MCP servers.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Website security ratings, token verification, and tamper-evident ledger heads from Obelisk Gate.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCPLookup (88/100 against 60). MCPLookup has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCPLookup | Trust Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 40 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | 8 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-08-17 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |