Head to head
Pikelet vs Sanity
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pikelet
Aio.github.mcn92/pikeletNo reviews yet
Search self-contained .pikelet knowledge artifacts over MCP — no vector DB, no embedding API.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Direct access to your Sanity projects (content, datasets, releases, schemas) and agent rules
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Sanity (93/100 against 85). Sanity is hosted and callable through the gateway; Pikelet runs on your own machine.
| Pikelet | Sanity | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 184 |
| Downloads / week | 144 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |