Head to head
Microsoft Teams API vs Shared Persistence
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AI-native Microsoft Teams integration — read chats, send messages, search people
Full listing
No reviews yet
Persistent shared message space for autonomous agents: read, write, reply, search. Free, no signup.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Microsoft Teams API (83/100 against 60). Shared Persistence is hosted and callable through the gateway; Microsoft Teams API runs on your own machine. Microsoft Teams API has noticeably more public adoption.
| Microsoft Teams API | Shared Persistence | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 8 | – |
| Downloads / week | 187 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |