Head to head
Compartment vs SSH — policy-gated remote access
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Durable agentic memory, encrypted at rest. Fully offline: no network, no API key, no cloud.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 83 out of 100). SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.
| Compartment | SSH — policy-gated remote access | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 581 | 745 |
| Downloads / week | – | 9.3k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |