Head to head
UpgradeLens vs Secobserve
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
UpgradeLens
Cio.github.mattpicone/upgradelensNo reviews yet
npm/PyPI/Django dependency upgrades: security, runtime compatibility, migration, package ranking.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for SecObserve: triage findings, import scan reports and SBOMs, generate VEX.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Secobserve (83/100 against 67). UpgradeLens is hosted and callable through the gateway; Secobserve runs on your own machine. Secobserve has noticeably more public adoption.
| UpgradeLens | Secobserve | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 381 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |