Mmcp.market

Head to head

Marutap vs Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Marutapcom.marutap/marutap
C
No reviews yet

Agent requests a purchase, the human taps approve, the agent gets a card scoped to it.

Full listing
Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Codeio.github.varadfromeast/codex-agy-bridge
A
No reviews yet

Run parallel, resumable, human-operable Antigravity CLI sessions from any MCP agent harness

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code (92/100 against 67). Marutap is hosted and callable through the gateway; Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code runs on your own machine. Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code has noticeably more public adoption.

 MarutapAsync Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100A92/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–11
Downloads / week–156
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools714
Write actions27
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-17
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Marutap vs CHAP CoordinatorMarutap vs Trusty SquireMarutap vs BridgeNode MCPAll AI and agents servers