Head to head
AgentBill vs Mu
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
One spend ceiling per agent job, as MCP tools. Bound to a task_ref you pass, not a calendar month.
Full listing
No reviews yet
News, web search, mail, markets, weather, places, files, calendar, contacts. 67 tools, one endpoint.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AgentBill (95/100 against 84). Mu has noticeably more public adoption.
| AgentBill | Mu | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A95/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 7 | 434 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 156 |
| Write actions | — | 27 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-24 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |