Head to head
Malinois vs OpenQR
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Check a live app you own for public databases, leaked keys and exposed files.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Generate, edit and track dynamic (editable) QR codes with scan analytics. Hosted MCP and REST API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours OpenQR (86/100 against 60). OpenQR has noticeably more public adoption.
| Malinois | OpenQR | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 7 |
| Downloads / week | – | 45 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | 20 |
| Write actions | 1 | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Security | Security |