Head to head
MailMask vs zerm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Email for agents: domains, aliases, IMAP mailboxes, DNS, sending and webhooks via one API key.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Agent utility belt: memory, locks, webhook inboxes, timers, DNS, email, URL, timezone, cron
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MailMask (85/100 against 60). MailMask has noticeably more public adoption.
| MailMask | zerm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 24 |
| Write actions | — | 6 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category |