Head to head
Passiv Web Tools vs SecScan
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Free web tools for AI agents: HTML to Markdown, compliance scan, page profile, security headers.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Scan, monitor and fix a live web app from your editor: graded security reports with fix prompts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Passiv Web Tools (70/100 against 60). SecScan is hosted and callable through the gateway; Passiv Web Tools runs on your own machine.
| Passiv Web Tools | SecScan | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |