Head to head
Mags Tack Website MCP vs Octocode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Octocode (94/100 against 69). Mags Tack Website MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Octocode runs on your own machine. Octocode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Mags Tack Website MCP | Octocode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 475 |
| Downloads / week | – | 467 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |