Head to head
MCP vs Context7
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only Mafdet AI account tools (models, balance, usage, subscription) and docs search.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Context7 (90/100 against 55). Context7 is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. Context7 has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Context7 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | New | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 62k |
| Downloads / week | 90 | 618k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |