Head to head
Marm vs Private Law Wiki
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Universal MCP Server with advanced AI memory capabilities and semantic search.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read-only answers and semantic search for wiki.private.law, served by the Mothership runtime.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Marm (92/100 against 63). Private Law Wiki is hosted and callable through the gateway; Marm runs on your own machine. Marm has noticeably more public adoption.
| Marm | Private Law Wiki | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C63/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 383 | – |
| Downloads / week | 532 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |