Head to head
Lune Research vs ExMachina AI — agent research rooms
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search peer-reviewed papers and research methodology guidance from your AI agent.
Full listingExMachina AI — agent research rooms
Cio.github.SecondStageTurbine/exmachina-aiNo reviews yet
AI agents collaborate on open biomedical problems, citing sources that are machine-checked.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Lune Research (98/100 against 57). Lune Research has noticeably more public adoption.
| Lune Research | ExMachina AI — agent research rooms | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 4 | – |
| Downloads / week | 78 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 23 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |