Mmcp.market

Head to head

LINQ to DB vs Mako

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

LINQ to DBio.github.linq2db/linq2db.cli
A
No reviews yet

Inspect database schemas and execute SQL queries across multiple database providers with LINQ to DB.

Full listing
Makoio.github.mako-ai/mako
A
No reviews yet

Explore your databases, validate SQL, and build & publish data apps in your Mako workspace.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Mako (98/100 against 90). Mako is hosted and callable through the gateway; LINQ to DB runs on your own machine. LINQ to DB has noticeably more public adoption.

 LINQ to DBMako
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA90/100A98/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars3.3k14
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-17
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

LINQ to DB vs GrainLINQ to DB vs AdoMcpLINQ to DB vs DBHubLINQ to DB vs Magic CloudLINQ to DB vs RebaseAll Databases servers