Head to head
gha-doctor vs uploads.sh
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
gha-doctor
Cio.github.linnea-bakshi/gha-doctorNo reviews yet
Diagnose GitHub Actions CI: lint, flaky tests, wasted minutes, health score. Read-only MCP tools.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Host files from coding agents; stage on a branch and attach to GitHub PRs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours uploads.sh (92/100 against 68). uploads.sh is hosted and callable through the gateway; gha-doctor runs on your own machine. uploads.sh has noticeably more public adoption.
| gha-doctor | uploads.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 19 |
| Downloads / week | – | 449 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |