Mmcp.market

Head to head

Lightbill vs three.ws Agent Payments

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Lightbillio.github.lightnet19/lightbill-mcp-server
B
No reviews yet

LightBill ISP billing MCP server: 134 tools (customers, routers, OLT, invoices, payment).

Full listing
three.ws Agent Paymentsio.github.nirholas/agentcore-payments-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Governed x402 payment sessions: pay any endpoint with budget, allowlist & per-tx caps, no key.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Agent Payments (83/100 against 75). three.ws Agent Payments has noticeably more public adoption.

 Lightbillthree.ws Agent Payments
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB75/100B83/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars0206
Downloads / week–40
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools100—
Write actions38—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-08-072026-09-22
CategoryFinanceFinance

Other comparisons

Lightbill vs XeroLightbill vs EqvittaLightbill vs three.ws TutorLightbill vs X402 ListLightbill vs E ArveldajaAll Finance servers