Head to head
artifact-site vs Context7
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
One place for every AI agent's pages and docs: versioned links to share, search and update.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours artifact-site (98/100 against 90). Context7 has noticeably more public adoption.
| artifact-site | Context7 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 14 | 62k |
| Downloads / week | – | 618k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |