Head to head
Whitemagic vs Nanograms to grams, number discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first memory and session continuity for AI coding agents over MCP. No cloud, no telemetry.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 91 out of 100). Nanograms to grams, number discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; Whitemagic runs on your own machine.
| Whitemagic | Nanograms to grams, number discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.0k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 30 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |