Head to head
Lathe vs Memory Vault
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Managed Postgres, Redis, CouchDB and NATS on a dedicated EU machine, one flat price.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid search. Postgres + pgvector. Self-hosted, MIT.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (70 and 70 out of 100). Lathe is hosted and callable through the gateway; Memory Vault runs on your own machine. Memory Vault has noticeably more public adoption.
| Lathe | Memory Vault | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 63 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |