Head to head
SOAR Record Gateway vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SOAR security playbooks for AI agents: fetch, full-text search, and count. Metered via Stripe.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Typed record store + hybrid search over MCP: deterministic lookups + semantic memory, per-customer.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (82/100 against 60). SOAR Record Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| SOAR Record Gateway | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 299 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |