Head to head
LoreDocs vs OrchestKit Docs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
LoreDocs
Bio.github.labyrinth-analytics/loredocsNo reviews yet
Local-first knowledge vaults for project docs and specs. Tagged, versioned, full-text searchable.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read-only MCP server for the OrchestKit docs: full-text search + Markdown fetch. No auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours OrchestKit Docs MCP (91/100 against 80). OrchestKit Docs MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; LoreDocs runs on your own machine. OrchestKit Docs MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| LoreDocs | OrchestKit Docs MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 278 |
| Downloads / week | 41 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 51 | — |
| Write actions | 7 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |