Head to head
mcp-video vs Inkmotion
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Compatibility package: mcp-video now installs Kinocut (formerly mcp-video).
Full listingInkmotion
Cio.github.Omnipotent6/inkmotionNo reviews yet
Turn a topic, URL, or document into a narrated, animated explainer video.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-video (91/100 against 67). Inkmotion is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-video runs on your own machine. mcp-video has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-video | Inkmotion | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 160 | – |
| Downloads / week | 335 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Media | Media |