Head to head
Doc Extract vs Tooldash
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Doc Extract
Bio.github.koraynar/doc-extract-mcpNo reviews yet
Document tooling for AI agents: PDF/text reading, chunking, schema-validated JSON output.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Offline PDF and text tools: merge, extract pages, inspect, clean text. No upload, no API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tooldash (92/100 against 70).
| Doc Extract | Tooldash | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 44 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-28 | 2026-08-28 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |