Head to head
Reverie vs trip2g
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Graph memory that dreams: Neo4j knowledge-graph memory for AI agents with hybrid search
Full listing
No reviews yet
Serve a folder of Markdown notes as an MCP server: hybrid search, reading, and sourced answers.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours trip2g (89/100 against 80). trip2g is hosted and callable through the gateway; Reverie runs on your own machine.
| Reverie | trip2g | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 69 | 39 |
| Downloads / week | 63 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 11 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |