Head to head
GitWarren vs Side Tracking
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Code review on your own machine, for you and your coding agent. Nothing leaves your computer.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Server-side conversion tracking, installed and configured by your AI coding agent.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Side Tracking (94/100 against 86). GitWarren has noticeably more public adoption.
| GitWarren | Side Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 16 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 1.0k | 54 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 17 | — |
| Write actions | 7 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-25 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |