Head to head
Silica Core vs Website Auditor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Retrieval over the folder the session opened: files, search, read, code_pack, write_note.
Full listingNo reviews yet
AI visibility + site audits: see if ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude & Gemini recommend a website.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Silica Core (92/100 against 83). Silica Core has noticeably more public adoption.
| Silica Core | Website Auditor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 60 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 396 | 140 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |