Head to head
Silica Core vs Contract Compass
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Retrieval over the folder the session opened: files, search, read, code_pack, write_note.
Full listingContract Compass
Bapp.sallim/contract-compassNo reviews yet
Korean public procurement law: rule-engine rulings, statutes search, live court precedents
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Silica Core (92/100 against 81). Contract Compass is hosted and callable through the gateway; Silica Core runs on your own machine. Silica Core has noticeably more public adoption.
| Silica Core | Contract Compass | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 60 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 396 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 11 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |