Head to head
Silica Core vs e-yearbook.com Archive Search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Retrieval over the folder the session opened: files, search, read, code_pack, write_note.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Search over 300,000 U.S. yearbooks and over 100 million person records; paid image unlocks paused.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Silica Core (92/100 against 60). e-yearbook.com Archive Search is hosted and callable through the gateway; Silica Core runs on your own machine. Silica Core has noticeably more public adoption.
| Silica Core | e-yearbook.com Archive Search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 60 | – |
| Downloads / week | 396 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |