Head to head
x402 Micro Tollgate vs Softkiln Deploy
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
x402 Micro Tollgate
Bio.github.kevin2003050666-coder/x402-micro-tollgateNo reviews yet
x402 HTTP 402 + MCP paywall: charge USDC per agent call. Self-host via npx or Docker.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Host apps built with AI: deploy to a live HTTPS URL, custom domains, secrets and backups.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours x402 Micro Tollgate (80/100 against 70). Softkiln Deploy is hosted and callable through the gateway; x402 Micro Tollgate runs on your own machine. x402 Micro Tollgate has noticeably more public adoption.
| x402 Micro Tollgate | Softkiln Deploy | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 26 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-05 | — |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |