Head to head
MCP vs csvql
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Connect your AI assistants to Keboola and expose your data, transformations, SQL queries, ...
Full listing
No reviews yet
Query CSV files with SQL via MCP. Fast, local, zero-config, read-only, sandboxable with --root.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 88). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; csvql runs on your own machine.
| MCP | csvql | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 86 | 27 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |